Dennis Novak vs Christian Sigsgaard Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 Feb at 03:29 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Novak vs C. Sigsgaard

AUT
0
Win
Played
1
Win

DEN
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Novak 0 - 1 Sigsgaard
They have played 2 sets in total, with Dennis Novak winning 0 and Christian Sigsgaard winning 2. The last match between Christian Sigsgaard and Dennis Novak was at the M25 Trento, 21-02-2025, Round: QF, Surface: I.hard, with Christian Sigsgaard getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Novak | 0 |
| Sigsgaard | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M25 Trento(02-21-25)
D. Novak vs C. Sigsgaard H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $838,895 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 61.84% (530-327) | Career Total W/L | 63.68% (128-73) |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 26 | Titles | 2 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
D. Novak vs C. Sigsgaard Match Preview:
🎾 Second Serve Shenanigans: As we dive into the world of tennis stats, where numbers are as crucial as that post-match Gatorade, Sigsgaard has been showing off a cool 53.18% success rate on second serves over the last six months. Meanwhile, Novak is feeling a tad generous with a 48.51% rate, allowing his opponents more bites at the apple. Remember, in tennis land, these numbers are like Mystic Meg's predictions but with better accuracy.
🏃♂️ Return Game Circus: When it comes to playing catch, Sigsgaard catches a whopping 57.01% of his rivals' second serve points, making him the unofficial champion of return games. Novak, meanwhile, is just a few steps behind at 53.82%. But don’t throw away your foam finger just yet because first serve returns are a closer competition. Sigsgaard snags 35.35% while Novak is hot on his tails with 34.1%. It’s like trying to pick a favorite in a cake competition; deliciously confusing!
😅 Breakpoint Hustle: Feeling the pressure? Not Sigsgaard, who plays the hero role and saves 67.39% of breakpoints, giving his fans fewer heart palpitations. Novak, on the other hand, is sitting pretty at 60.96%. These stats are your secret sauce in predicting game outcomes when placing a bet—quicker than betting on who finishes the post-match banana smoothie first!
✨ Performance Parade: Over the past year, Sigsgaard has shown victory smiles 69.23% of the time, finishing 18-8 in matches. Novak, while not far behind, has a 54.39% win rate tallying 31-26. Looking for the stats to fulfill your fortune-telling tennis needs? Here’s your ticket to the prediction carnival. Also, don’t mind the turf—the surface changes everything! Sigsgaard is a clay aficionado with a win rate of 64%, while Novak feels at home on the hard courts, succeeding 69% of the time. Just don’t ask them about grass—it’s Sigsgaard’s personal kryptonite, registering a win rate of 0%!
😎 Player Level Comedy: Our hero Sigsgaard wins lots on the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K circuit with a win rate of 69.23%. Novaks’ playground is more Challenger/ITF territory with a 50% win rate drag show-off. Remember, it’s all fun and games until someone breaks a string.
🤔 Opponent Quality & Deciding Drama: When sizing up foes, Sigsgaard battles opponents with an average rank of 465, giving him the underdog vibes we love. Novak’s foes average at 325.56, adding more tension to the show. In nail-biting deciding sets, Sigsgaard outshines with a 60% win rate, while Novak holds the fort at 44%. It’s the stuff of thriller movie finales, with tennis racquets instead of popcorn!
💡 Breakpoint Bonanza: If breakpoint opportunities were gold mines, Sigsgaard would own 42.03% of them, slightly outfoxing Novak’s 41.79%. Keep your eyes on these stats if you’re plotting your next great victory in in-game live betting. Just remember—all predictions are tennis-ball jokes until proven otherwise!
Dennis Novak vs Christian Sigsgaard Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Novak vs C. Sigsgaard H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 6 | Games Won | 12 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:3:20 | Average Match Time | 1:3:20 |
| 56% (31/55) | 1st Serve % | 58% (35/60) |
| 71% (22/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (25/35) |
| 38% (9/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (14/25) |
| 20% (1/5) | Break Pts Won % | 40% (4/10) |
| 35% (21/60) | Return Points Win % | 44% (24/55) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
D. Novak Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-2 3-6 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Q3 | W | 4-6 6-3 3-0 ret. | ||
C. Sigsgaard Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
QF | W | 1-6 6-4 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 7-5 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||

D. Novak vs C. Sigsgaard Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.84% (530/327) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.68% (128/73) |
| 59.57% (1195/811) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.86% (286/169) |
| 53.26% (10072/8838) | Games Win/Loss | 55.23% (2361/1914) |
| 67.80% (120/57) | Hard Win/Loss | 64.04% (57/32) |
| 62.05% (291/178) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.30% (38/23) |
| 54.12% (92/78) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.00% (33/17) |
| 65.85% (27/14) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 2444 | Aces Total | 460 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1713 | Total Double Faults | 318 |
| 1:9:48 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 527.15 | Average Opponent Rank | 442.17 |
| 65% (29394/45490) | 1st Serve % | 66% (6804/10312) |
| 69% (20153/29394) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (4578/6804) |
| 50% (8054/16095) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (1862/3508) |
| 42% (1980/4700) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (516/1082) |
| 40% (18502/46161) | Return Points Win % | 42% (4434/10550) |
| 58.62% (34/24) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (11/11) | Cups W/L | 28.57% (2/5) |
| 45.98% (40/47) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53.98% (190/162) | Challenger W/L | 37.50% (3/5) |
| 75.60% (254/82) | Futures W/L | 66.13% (123/63) |
| 62% (514/823) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (123/194) |
| 46% (12/26) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 75% (3/4) |
| 56% (158/284) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (29/52) |
| 53% (138/261) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (20/50) |
| 86% (517/446) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (133/114) |
| 14% (517/70) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (133/19) |
| 24% (340/83) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (68/14) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Argentina Open – Buenos Aires Preview And Prediction: Varvara Lepchenko vs Panna Udvardy Betting Tips & Picks November 30, 2025

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets
